# Ether, G Etherons and Gravitation

Here you can find our book

Etherons are at the very base of the matter. In the past, I have often expressed my personal interest in the description of the ether. I showed it both in articles posted on this website or even written on the pages of the book I have just published. “Dossier 111-the real measures of the flat Earth” is now available and distributed by Lulu.com

## A disturbing movement in the space-time

The ether is the mean through which the light moves. And, when I use this word, light, I just mean an electromagnetic wave, either visible or invisible. Light has one and only one nature, the wave nature of it. On the contrary, the particle nature belongs to the ether.  Ether is made of particles having no or very little mass. They start vibrating when hit by any disturb moving in the space-time. I want to repeat. This is the way we can define the electromagnetic waves: a disturb moving in the ether in space and time. When etherons oscillate with a wavelength between 400 and 700 nm, then the wave is visible to our eyes. The etheron that vibrates doesn’t move in the space with the wave but only oscillates a certain number of times around its equilibrium position.

## A mean with features of elasticity and inertia

To obtain the transmission of a wave you need an elastic mean, otherwise, it is not possible to explain the wave nature of the electromagnetic radiation. We need a mean with features of elasticity and inertia. In order to understand, think, please, to a compressed spring. This spring is provided with elasticity. So, when you compress and release it, you can be sure that it will return immediately to its natural position. But, in order to obtain an oscillation, you have to add a mass, the inertia.

## A compressed spring

Inertia causes the compressed spring to release its energy, return to its natural position, overcome it, elongate to a max position. Then, finally, it returns oscillating again. In an electromagnetic wave, elasticity is linked to the electric side of radiation, while inertia will be linked to the magnetic side of the wave. Think of a spark lighting up between two plates of a charged capacitor. This release of energy can be compared to the release of a compressed spring. The variation of charge and current is the starting point for the production of a magnetic field in opposition to the variation. This can be compared to the inertia. Elasticity and inertia are peculiar of the mean in which an elastic wave moves. Without elasticity and inertia, it would not be possible to posit the formation of a wave that has to move to and fro. Science has to explain how a wave could propagate if the empty space would not show both these characteristics. You can remember, in fact, that Einstein, when postulating that the space-time undergoes a curve near a mass, resolved to assign to it some notable feature of elasticity.

## Euler and the ether

I’ll try to describe a little better the fact the ether possesses elasticity. I’m going to consider the electric field arising from an electrical charge in the space. If you charge a metallic bead in the near space, you create a new state of things, which originates an electric field. An electric field, arising from the presence of a charge in the space, is a static stress of the ether. It produces a different arrangement of the etherons in the area. Euler explained a field of force in the ether by saying that the etherons settle according to an arrangement which possesses different densities.

## Paul Laviolette

However, Paul Laviolette introduced a different model. His aim was to describe some different kind of etherons. He could imagine they were arranged in a different way in the space. With a positive charge Y, etherons are denser next to the charge, while X etherons become denser far from the charge. Etherons can change from X to Y and vice versa, with kinetic reactions depending on the situation. Etherons can also become, according to Laviolette, G etherons, which are responsible for the gravity field.  I don’t know which of the two is the correct explanation, but I agree with both the hypotheses. I suppose, as both the authors do, that, in the ether, any force field produces an elastic stress or a form of deformation. This can be the result of a different arrangement of the etherons, according to different densities, due to their position, further or nearer to the charge.

## Etherons arranged in different ways

Gravity is a force field too. It determines a stress in the ether. I want here to repeat that Newton’s description of gravity is not reliable. This is due to the fact that it doesn’t respect the energy conservation principle. Masses don’t attract one to the other. There is no real experimental proof attesting that. The Cavendish torsion balance doesn’t prove gravity but is caused by a natural electrostatic attraction.

We all know, however, that over the Earth there’s a powerful force attracting all masses downward. What is the natural cause of it? I said there is a stress on the ether that produces a strain, i.e. a different disposal of the etherons. This density variation in space produces the gravity force.

## Intensity

There is, however, a difference between the force field produced by a charge and that produced by the Earth: the intensity. A charge produces a weak force field that acts only upon another charge, repelling or attracting it. The gravity field is many and many times more intense. But how? Probably you already know that the Earth and the dome, together, constitute the plates of a capacitor. Between these two plates, there is a very high difference of potential. This is what stresses the ether producing the force field we know to be the gravity field. How can I give evidence for this? By deduction: let’s see.

## The Biefeld-Brown effect

Sometimes in the past, I was referring to the Biefeld-Brown effect. Thomas Brown discovered that, by charging a capacitor with asymmetric plates, with tensions between 25 and 100 Kilovolts, a repulsive force originated, able to lift the capacitor in the air. It occurred during some experiment on x-rays. Upon void tubes, asymmetric electrodes where mounted, with opposite polarities. At that point, when the electrodes were connected to the high tension electricity, the existence of an electric force came to the fore. Tests revealed the electrogravitic nature of the phenomenon. In 1928 Brown registered the first patent of a lifter. Till some year ago, students considered the lifter as the simple push effect of the ionic wind. In other words, the phenomenon was thought to be the flux of charged particles produced by an electric field with high potential. However, in 2004 NASA admitted that the real explanation could be different.

## The Ionic Wind Explanation

In March 2003, experimentation conducted by a military research center of Maryland categorically refused the ionic wind explanation. The final report states: “The ionic wind generated by the lifter is at least three times less than the one necessary for the lifting.” The lifter, moreover, works perfectly also in the void. As a conclusion,  Nasa registered some patent to use the lifter in the space too. Up to now, incidentally, Nasa keeps on claiming that, in the space, no air is detectable. Anyway, a research conducted by Honda engineers came to the conclusion that the Biefeld Brown effect is an interaction of magnetic fields on particles of void energy (etherons). These researchers prove that this effect can’t be explained with normal science and that gravity and void energy (ether) are linked one to the other.

## Thomas Brown’s Lifter and the Dome

Finally, we can conclude that the Lifter produces a non-uniform distribution of etherons that generates a force field lifting the capacitor. In practice, a great number of etherons accumulate under the upper plate of the lifter. The pressure of the etherons becomes greater in the lower part than in the upper part. So the resulting push will be sufficient to lift the component. Noteworthy is the fact that the shape of the lifter produced by Brown is the same of the flat Earth with the dome.

The Earth is an asymmetric capacitor. The very high tension on the dome produces a concentration of etherons which is not uniform and produces the gravitational force field. There is, thus, a force the etherons can exercise downward. To obtain this gravitational effect, the tension must be very high. Technicians have measured more than 25Kilovolts, up to 100 kilovolts. All bodies, in such a force field, undergo an upper pressure greater than the lower pressure and are subject to a downward force.

## Conclusions

When a lifter is activated, the high tension on an asymmetric capacitor produces a non-uniform distribution of etherons, with a consequent upward push. To explain this effect I have the necessity to describe the earth as a space gathered inside a curved electrified dome extending over a flat, plane surface, which is the other plate of a big capacitor.