The vortex atom made of ether

In a past article, I have introduced a new atomic model. Its main characteristic is that the atom is completely made of ether. The electron is a spherical wave that moves around the nucleus and is made of oscillating etherons arranged all around the nucleus. In that article I was assuming the nucleus, the positive charge inside the atom owes its positive charge to an abundance of etherons in respect of the average quantity of etherons inside the atoms. On the other hand, I posited the electron, the negative side of the atom, owes its charge to a scarcity of etherons in respect to the average. Cf. Electrons: a new insight

Establishing the truth

This has been, however, an arbitrary decision and the contrary could be possible. To better define the model  I have to establish the truth: whether the electron or the nucleus has an abundance of etherons and vice versa.  To give an answer I have to define what the cause of the atom is. How does this non-uniform distribution of etherons have an origin? In the past, a number of physicists expressed by describing the atoms as made of ether. Many of them described the atoms as made of vortexes of ether.

A toroidal vortex of ether

Tesla, Lord Kelvin, the same Thompson, the discoverer of the electron, were describing the atom as made by a toroidal vortex of ether.

This hypothesis had followers for about 30 years, up to the end of the 19th century. However,  it was not accepted in Germany where physics were in expectation for Einstein’s theories. After the Michelson Morley experiment, the idea of ether fell into disuse and science began to refuse its same existence.

As above, so below

Anyway,  up to now, I  always considered the existence of a cosmic vortex that moves all celestial bodies and generates gravity.  As above, so below or better, as written in Matthew 6:10 ”as in heaven also on earth”.

Moreover, the cosmic vortex produces a non-uniform concentration of etherons. Due to the rotation and shape of the vortex, there is a difference in speed inside. It is slower in the upper and larger part and faster in the lower and narrower part. The difference is due to the conservation of the angular momentum that is a result of the energy conservation principle.

As a consequence of the Bernoulli principle, the super-fluid called ether will be denser where the vortex is slower and rarer where faster. This non-homogeneous distribution produces a vertical movement of etherons in the attempt of reestablishing the equilibrium.

A cosmic vortex and an atomic one

Let’s try to make an analogy with the vortex that constitutes the atom. If you had to say what could be, within the cosmic vortex, the positively charged nucleus, what would you indicate? The external and denser part or the internal and rarer one? Obviously, the nucleus is internal. A vortex that narrows in the center is inevitably faster there and consequently with less density (due to the Bernoulli principle). The negatively charged electron is thus the external and denser part of the vortex.

An original creative act

So, I have to correct my first and arbitrary choice.  The angular conservation momentum produces a rarefaction of the etherons as they move nearer to the center of the atom. But what is the origin of these vortexes? First of all, we must recognize that there is an original creative act from God. Anyway, I think that vortexes could be linked to the magnetic field of the Earth and to the cosmic vortex. I hope I will be able to understand something more in a short time.

However, you know by now that the atom is a vortex moving like a sound wave in the etherons that fill the whole packet. The oscillating frequency gives stability to the atom and creates its reactivity within its proximity.

Experimental results we can’t ignore

It is clear that this description of the atom is very different from the one given by the scientific apparatus. The currently accepted description of the atom is, however, based on a series of experimental results that we simply can’t ignore. We will evaluate some of them to see if they can be set into harmony at the light of the new model.

An experiment by William Crookes

The discovery of the electron as a particle with mass got developed thanks to a series of experiments. They were performed during the nineteenth century on the basis of the electric conduction through rarefied gases. Crookes was one of the scientists implied in those experiments. He was using a device made with a glass tube with two electrodes welded at the extremities of it. These electrodes were supplied from a continuous current generator with a potential of 10000V.

At the interior of the tube, air is replaced with a known gas whatever. Then Crookes made the void in the tube with a void pump.  The scientist noticed that, under 0,4 atmospheres of absolute pressure, a diffuse luminosity between the two electrodes generated. Going down till 10-6 atmospheres, the luminosity interested the whole gas. In this situation, the glass in front of the cathode emitted a weak luminescence due to fluorescence.

A movement of electrons

At the time, scientists were thinking that radiations were produced by the cathode. Today, science says that these rays are formed by electrons that move from the cathode to the anode, making the surface they hit fluorescent.

Electrons projecting a shadow

Scientists were able to behold that the electrons projected a shadow, proving hence that they were moving in a rectilinear way.

In 1895, Perrin saw that an electroscope hit by the cathodic radiation was negatively electrified. This was the evidence of the negative charge of the electrons. Other experiments, led on the cathode rays, proved the rays are particles because they are able to put into the rotation a small turbine mounted between the electrodes.

The basis of the structure of all the matter

So, we have to keep into consideration all these initial experiments. On the other hand, there is an emerging new model based on the notion that the ether is an actual reality and it is on the basis of the structure of all the physical matter. How could we explain these experiments at the light of this new model?

A non-uniform arrangement of the ether

Empirically we can say that, between two electrodes with a big difference of potential, the ether arranges in a non-uniform way.  According to the model of the vortex, we posited the negative charge is where there is an abundance of etherons. We could thus suppose that, by applying an electrical tension to the electrodes, the etherons would begin to move toward the cathode in order to establish the new non-uniform distribution in the space. When this tension is applied, a wind of ether arises.

The etherons move and hit in their movement the gas particles. While hitting them, a part of the energy of the etheron is transferred to the gas particle. So, it gives back the energy in the form of luminous radiation (fluorescent effect).

An electroscope with golden leaves

You can experimentally behold that an electroscope with golden leaves put behind the anode is negatively electrified.

This phenomenon is due to the presence of an abundance of etherons around the electroscope. It is produced by the wind of etherons. A wind of ether arises between the leaves of the electroscope, too. The golden leaves thus depart one from the other.

Proving that a particle wind arises

The wind of etherons between the electrodes acts with a small force over the turbine that starts moving. This proves that a particle wind arises.  The idea is that these particles are not electrons but etherons. The fact that etherons are able to generate a force becomes clear when we consider the gravity force generated by a wind of etherons.

The conclusion of this article is that the atom is a vortex of ether. The vortex generates a non-uniform distribution of etherons with an abundance of them in the external part. It also engenders the negative wavelike oscillating electron. Thus, it gives origin to an internal part, the positively charged nucleus characterized by a scarcity of etherons. Obviously, all the subject needs further investigation.


Leave a Reply